CML Center for Media Literacy: Empowerment Through Education
Choose a Focus Page:    
   
CML Medialit Kit
Reading Room
Media & Values
Best Practices
Professional Development
Alliances
Resources
Consulting/Speaking
 
About CML
Newsletter
FAQ
Site Overview
Contact Us
 
Rights & Permissions
 
 

Media&Values

This article originally appeared in Issue #44 / Summer/Fall 1988


Topic / Subject Area:
Advertising / Consumerism

Related Articles:
Reagan’s ‘Image-Makers’ Redefined the Presidency
One Journalist's View: Informed Voters Must Reach Beyond Images
Reaching for the Common Good: Moyers interviews Bellah


Bill Moyers on Political Ads

I don't buy the argument that political spots undermine democracy. In a way they serve democracy by reaching more people in a single instant than a whistlestop campaign ever could or a speech or a stump. When William Jennings Bryan was running for president, his speeches sometimes lasted three hours. Imagine him trying that on a television audience that's come to expect fast, fast, fast relief.

One thing to be said for political spots is that they enable political candidates to choose their message on their terms. The politician is not left to the mercy of newspaper editors or television producers, looking for that ten second excerpt that fits the reporter's script. The fact is, candidates can say a lot in thirty seconds that a voter should know about them or their opponent. And I'm not worried that they'll carry the day. No spot has the last word. We have news reports, the opposition's campaign, other publications, and our own common sense against which to measure its claims.

— Bill Moyers

Back to top



Home / CML MediaLit Kit™ / Rights & Permissions / Contact Us
© 2002-2007 Center for Media Literacy