def

What is Media Literacy? A Definition...and More.

Sub Head: 

CML's definition focuses media literacy as education for 21st century.

Body: 

The definition most often cited in the US is a succinct sentence hammered out by participants at the 1992 Aspen Media Literacy Leadership Institute:

 … the ability to access, analyze, evaluate and create media in a variety of forms.

Definitions, however, evolve over time and a more robust definition is now needed to situate media literacy in the context of its importance for the education of students in a 21st century media culture. CML uses this expanded definition:

• Media Literacy is a 21st century approach to education.
• It provides a framework to access, analyze, evaluate and create messages in a variety of forms - from print to video to the Internet.
• Media literacy builds an understanding of the role of media in society as well as essential skills of inquiry and self-expression necessary for citizens of a democracy.

What is important to understand is that media literacy is not about "protecting" kids from unwanted messages. Although some groups urge families to just turn the TV off, the fact is, media are so ingrained in our cultural milieu that even if you turn off the set, you still cannot escape today's media culture. Media no longer just influence our culture. They ARE our culture.

Media literacy, therefore, is about helping students become competent, critical and literate in all media forms so that they control the interpretation of what they see or hear rather than letting the interpretation control them.

To become media literate is not to memorize facts or statistics about the media, but rather to learn to raise the right questions about what you are watching, reading or listening to. Len Masterman, the acclaimed author of Teaching the Media, calls it "critical autonomy" or the ability to think for oneself.

Without this fundamental ability, an individual cannot have full dignity as a human person or exercise citizenship in a democratic society where to be a citizen is to both understand and contribute to the debates of the time.

from Literacy in a Media Age: An Overview and Orientation Guide to Media LIteracy Education

 

Empowerment through Education

Sub Head: 

Educational Philosophy of the Center for Media Literacy

Body: 

The Center for Media Literacy advocates a philosophy of empowerment through education. This philosophy incorporates three intertwining concepts:

1. Media literacy is education for life in a global media world.

For 500 years, since the invention of moveable type, we have valued the ability to read and write as the primary means of communicating and understanding history, cultural traditions, political and social philosophy and the news of the day. In more recent times, traditional literacy skills ensured that individuals could participate fully as engaged citizens and functioning adults in society. Today families, schools and all community institutions share the responsibility for preparing young people for living and learning in a global culture that is increasingly connected through multi-media and influenced by powerful images, words and sounds.

2. The heart of media literacy is informed inquiry.

Through a four-step 'inquiry' process of Awareness . . . Analysis . . . Reflection . . .Action, media literacy helps young people acquire an empowering set of "navigational" skills which include the ability to:

  • Access information from a variety of sources.
  • Analyze and explore how messages are "constructed" -- whether print, verbal, visual or multi-media.
  • Evaluate media's explicit and implicit messages against one's own ethical, moral and/or democratic principles.
  • Express or create their own messages using a variety of media tools.

3. Media literacy is an alternative to censoring, boycotting or blaming 'the media.'

Deeply committed to freedom of expression, media literacy does not promote partisan agendas or political points of view. The power of media literacy is its ability to inspire independent thinking and foster critical analysis.
The ultimate goal of media education is to make wise choices possible.

Embracing this philosophy, the Center for Media Literacy is committed to media education as an essential and empowering life-skill for the 21st Century.

 

 

Literacy for the 21st Century: An Overview & Orientation Guide to Media Literacy Education

Article Images: 
 
1st EDITION
Deconstruction Only


Download the document:
In English
En Español
Sub Head: 

CML's plain language introduction to the basic elements of inquiry-based media education.

Body: 

SECOND EDITION
Now expanded
to include the Questions/TIPS (Q/TIPS) for both construction/production and deconstruction!

How does media literacy relate to the construction of media? How can critical thinking be taught and learned while students are producing media?

It's not enough to know how to press buttons on technological equipment: thinking is even more important. Find out how to connect thinking with production in CML's newly published 2nd Edition of Literacy for the 21st Century!

In a short and readable format, it:

    • Provides a complete framework for critical inquiry, using CML’s Five Core Concepts, and Five Key Questions for both construction and deconstruction of media, along with handouts.

    • Gives explanations and Guiding Questions to illustrate how to connect the Key Questions when consuming or producing or participating with media.

    • Provides in-depth explanations and the foundational role of the Five Key Questions of Media Literacy.

    • Offers a sample inquiry into visual language: "How to Conduct a ‘Close Analysis' of a Media ‘Text.'"

Along with its handouts, Literacy for the 21st Century is an invaluable reference for teachers, media librarians, curriculum developers, researchers and anyone who wants to understand what media literacy is all about and/or explain it to others.

As a resource for workshops, graduate seminars or faculty in-service programs, it provides an unparalleled overview of the field and a common language and vocabulary for building a media literacy program in a school or district.

Literacy for the 21st Century is Part I of CML's educational framework, the CML MediaLit Kit which identifies and describes the theory, practice and implementation of media literacy in preK-12 education.

FIRST EDITION

While only exploring CML's framework for deconstruction or critical analysis of media, Edition 1 is still "basic training" for critical thinking about media. It is written from the point of view of media consumers, and offers CML's Five Key Questions for deconstructing media.

 

Breaking Boundaries with Video Production: Inteview with Steve Goodman

Article Images: 

Citation: 

This interview originally appeared in Strategies for Media Literacy newsletter, spring 1993; reprrinted with permission of the author.

Body: 

Since 1984, Educational Video Center (EVC) in New York has trained and assisted hundreds of young people in producing award-winning broadcast quality video documentaries. But to EVC Founder Steve Goodman, the goal is not external rewards but internal transformation. In this excerpt from an interview conducted in 1993 by Kathleen Tyner for Strategies newsletter, he explains the importance to media literacy of young people creating and producing their own video documentaries. In addition to publishing several excellent handbooks for video production, Goodman published in 2003 a major new work: Teaching Youth Media: A Critical Guide to Literacy, Video Production and Social Change.

SML: What's the EVC philosophy of education?

Steve Goodman: Our philosophy is based on having kids start with their own lived experiences and then looking at other experiences and problems. They inquire about issues in their own communities and deepen that inquiry through research and through a continuous dialogue with other students and with the teacher. It's turning issues into problems that the students also then have an opportunity to try and resolve.

SML: Why did you decide on video?

S.G.: Because the effect of media is so profound. It's also accessible to them. It's the immediacy of video, too; the ability to manipulate video and then present it back to their fellow students and to the community.

SML: Could you recommend some books that influenced your work?

S.G.: Paulo Friere's Pedagogy of the Oppressed and John Dewey's Experience in Education and Democracy. Henry Giroux's work is really important. And the work of Michelle Fine. She's written some articles on the question of silencing. Young people, particularly teenagers who are low-income, working class, who tend to be more marginalized in our society, don't have a voice. Putting the media in their hands is a way of helping them find a voice. Very often kids are silenced by the institutions of our society, in the classroom or in the home. Video gives them an opportunity to talk back.

SML: Schools can be so resistant to new things! How does EVC fit in?

S.G.: I think that media education is really tied to the efforts of school restructuring and reform, like the Coalition of Essential Schools and Foxfire. I feel that we have principles and practices in common with the restructuring people. Schools don't have to be about silencing and marginalizing kids. If school is a place that is learner-centered where the kids are determining the direction of their learning based on their own lived experiences, the school can be extremely liberating.

SML: How do you teach media education?

S.G.: There is no way to prescribe "this is how to do it," but I think there are some general principles that make up what I think is sound education. Some of these practices have become buzz words, but the point is really to make them work. The goal is to help them be more critical thinkers and self-reflective as lifelong learners. Our society is about specialization and putting things into different compartments. Part of what we do at EVC is to break down the boundaries between schools and communities, between artist and audience.

SML: Are your students aware of the audience?

S.G.: The kids are very much in touch with who their audience is and have the opportunity to get feedback from the viewers who see their tapes. There's closeness between the producer and the viewer in our work. In a philosophical was, it breaks the boundaries between thought and practice.

SML: Have you found a connection between video making and reading and writing?

S.G.: Most of the students that we work with have learned to have a strong aversion to reading and writing and so making videos is really exciting to them. We insist that writing is a part of it. We want them to learn reasons for writing other than punitive or what they've learned to do as an assignment from someone else. We look at writing as a way to deepen their thinking and develop ideas. The writing is also a product that is open for discussion. There are other ways that we have them do writing. Portfolio assessments, for example. We have them do letters, not as an assignment, but because they need to get someone to agree to an interview. They have to learn to communicate. It's an outcome, not necessarily graded by the teacher, but a skill that is essential for them to develop what they have to say and how they're going to say it and then get a result.

SML: Why the focus on the documentary?

S.G.: Because I think that it is a wonderful way for them to bear witness to the conditions in their own lives and to document the problems that they may see and the solutions that they might feel are effective. They use the community as a subject of inquiry. They produce the documentary. They synthesize what they've found and then they give back what they've found and open it up for discussion, in order to galvanize people's thought and move them toward action. There is the understanding that they can participate in the culture and history of their community. In documentary, it's a more sustained exploration into something and it gives them the opportunity to grow and develop over the course of a 20-week term.

SML: How do you balance process over product?

S.G. There is a constant tension. It's a project-based way of learning, but you have to be sure that the process is not lost or sacrificed because you're trying to finish a project. At EVC, everyone has to contribute to all the different aspects of the project.

SML: What's the role of the teacher in this?

S.G.: It's a group process and the instructor is a member, the most mature, experienced member, of that group. The instructor has the responsibility to ensure that all the members are growing and learning and experiencing. That also speaks to breaking stereotypes. It's not fair for the boys to be using the equipment while the girls only do the phone work or are on camera. If it's truly collaborative and student-centered, the students and the teacher will talk about that, but it's still something that the teacher has to think about. The instructor has to judge a lot of things and be conscious that there is a product that we want to get out and there is an audience out there with certain expectations. So there's the process, we want to make it fair, we also want to make sure that there's a profound kind of learning that's going on. And then when things are going too smoothly, it's time to shake things up.

SML: Everybody wants to be EVC. How can we make this unique process available to others?

S.G. It can't be franchised and efforts at mass producing EVC demean it. It's false. It should be something that's home grown to the particular conditions of an area. It isn't something that just works with urban young people. But it is a way of learning that, as Foxfire has demonstrated, can be taught across the country. It's a matter of exposing people to particular principles and then seeing how they can make them their own. It's getting teachers to talk to each other more about how this kind of method works and sharing tapes and getting students and young people who've done it to talk to other young people. It's about empowering people.

 
Author Bio: 

Kathleen Tyner is a leading American media educator who lives in San Francisco. She is the author of Literacy in a Digital World: Teaching and Learning in the Age of Information.and has participated internationally in forums for UNESCO, the British Film Institute, Universidad Naticionales Educaciones Distancia (Madrid), and the World Council for Media Education.

What is Media Literacy? NAMLE's Short Answer and a Longer Thought

Article Images: 

 

Sub Head: 

Originally written and published by AMLA (2001) which is now NAMLE.

Body: 

The Short Version

Media literacy empowers people to be both critical thinkers and creative producers of an increasingly wide range of messages using image, language, and sound. It is the skillful application of literacy skills to media and technology messages. As communication technologies transform society, they impact our understanding of ourselves, our communities, and our diverse cultures, making media literacy an essential life skill for the 21st century.

...And A Broader Definition

Within North America, media literacy is seen to consist of a series of communication competencies, including the ability to ACCESS, ANALYZE, EVALUATE and COMMUNICATE information in a variety of forms including print and non-print messages. Interdisciplinary by nature, media literacy represents a necessary, inevitable and realistic response to the complex, ever-changing electronic environment and communication cornucopia that surrounds us.

To become a successful student, responsible citizen, productive worker, or competent and conscientious consumer, individuals need to develop expertise with the increasingly sophisticated information and entertainment media that address us on a multi-sensory level, affecting the way we think, feel and behave.

Today's information and entertainment technologies communicate to us through a powerful combination of words, images and sounds. As such we need to develop a wider set of literacy skills helping us to both comprehend the messages we receive, and to effectively utilize these tools to design and distribute our own messages. Being literate in a media age requires critical thinking skills which empower us as we make decisions, whether in the classroom, the living room, the workplace, the board room or the voting booth.

Finally, while media literacy does raise critical questions about the impact of media and technology, it is not an anti-media movement. Rather, it represents a coalition of concerned individuals and organizations, including educators, faith-based groups, health care-providers, and citizen and consumer groups, who seek a more enlightened way of understanding our media environment.

Over the years, many definitions and visions of media literacy have been created to reflect different points of view, different approaches and goals, and different audiences. As the field grows, we will post many of these definitions along with their sources.

 

Language of Media Literacy: A Glossary of Terms

Citation: 

This article first appeared in Mediacy, newsletter of the Association for Media Literacy / Canada. Reprinted with permission.

Body: 

Any specialized form of discourse has its own unique language and media literacy is no exception. Even experienced media teachers are often bewildered by the seemingly interchangeable terminology used by writers and speakers in the field. Do note that many of these terms have much wider meanings than are suggested here. We are only attempting to define these terms as they related to the field of media literacy education.

Access: The ability of media consumers to produce their own texts and to have those texts acknowledged by the agenda setting media. Also, the ability of media consumers to respond to the dominant media.

Agenda-setting: The ability of the media to tell people what and whom to talk and think about. Also refers to those media that have more credibility than their competition.

Analog: Media software which has a physical quality and presence.

Audience: The group of consumers for whom the media text was constructed as well as anyone else who is exposed to the text.

Branding: The process by which a commodity in the marketplace is known primarily for the image it projects rather than any actual quality.

Censorship: The practice of suppressing a text or part of a text that is considered objectionable according to certain standards.

Connote/Connotation: A description of value, meaning or ideology associated with a media text that is added to the text by the audience.

Construct or Construction: The process by which a media text is shaped and given meaning through a process that is subject to a variety of decisions and is designed to keep the audience interested in the text.

Consumers: The audience for whom a commercial media text is constructed and who responds to the text with commercial activity.

Convergence: The merging of previously separate communication industries such as publishing, computers, film, music and broadcasting, made possible by advances in technology.

Critical: A reflective position on the meaning, biases or value messages of a text.

Critical Autonomy: The process by which a member of the audience is able to read a media text in a way other than the preferred reading. Also used to describe the ability of media literacy students to deconstruct texts outside the classroom.

Critical Viewing: The ability to use critical thinking skills to view, question, analyze and understand issues presented overtly and covertly in
movies, videos, television and other visual media.

Cut: An edited transition between two images in which one image is immediately replaced by another.

Deconstruction: The process by which the audience identifies the elements that make up the construction of meaning within a text.

Demographics: Measurable characteristics of media consumers such as age, gender, race, education and income level.

Denote/Denotation: A description of a media text indicating its common sense, obvious meaning.

Digital: The storage and transmission of information by reducing it to digits and then reassembling it for an exact reproduction.

Docudrama: A filmed dramatization based on fact that combines documentary and fictional elements. In the production process, "based on" allows the creators of the text wide creative latitude and a docudrama is, at best, a skillful representation of a real person or event.

Dominant: When a text is read by the audience in a way that is intended by the creators of the text.

Flak: An organized attempt to influence media content, which can take the form of letters, phone calls, petitions, lawsuits and legislation.

Genre: A category of media texts characterized by a particular style, form or content.

Hardware: The physical equipment used to produce, distribute and exhibit media texts.

Hegemony/hegemonic: When dominant groups persuade subordinate groups that the dominant ideology is in their own best interests. The media's function in this process is to encourage maintenance of the status quo.

Homophobia: The fear of homosexuality as expressed by demeaning images in media texts.

HTML (Hypertext Markup Language): is a computer programming language that allows people to create links on the world wide web from one source of information to another in any order.

Ideology/Ideological: How we as individuals understand the world in which we live. This understanding involves an interaction between our individual psychologies and the social structures that surround us. Mediating between these are the individual processes of communication as well as the technological processes of the mass media. These ideas are usually related to the distribution of power.

Industry: The agencies and institutions involved with the production of media texts. The term is also used in a more restrictive sense to describe the commercial production of media texts for the purpose of making a profit.

Intertextuality: When a media text makes reference to another text that, on the surface, appears to be unique and distinct.

Jolts: Moments in a media text that are generated by a broad comedy, a violent act, movement within a frame, a loud noise, rapid editing, a
profanity or a sexually explicit representation, all of which are calculated to engage an audience's excitement.

Marketing: The way in which a product or media text is sold to a target audience.

Mass Media: Mass media refers to those media that are designed to be consumed by large audiences through the agencies of technology.

Media Education: Traditionally, it's the process by which one learns the technical production skills associated with creating media texts. More
recently, it has also included the intellectual processes of critical consumption or deconstruction of texts.

Media Literacy: The process of understanding and using the mass media in an assertive and non-passive way. This includes an informed and critical understanding of the nature of the media, the techniques used by them and the impact of these techniques.

Medium: The singular form of media, the term usually describes individual forms such as radio, television, film, etc.

Media: The plural form of medium; the term has come to mean all the industrial forms of mass communication combined.

Monopoly: Any commercial process in which one seller controls prices and supply of a product.

"Moral Panic": A sudden increase in public perception of the possible threat to societal values and interests because of exposure to media texts.

Narrative: How the plot or story is told. In a media text, narrative is the coherent sequencing of events across time and space.

Negotiate: The process of give and take by which members of the audience interpret, deconstruct and find meaning within a media text.

Oppositional: A critical position that is in opposition to the values and ideology intended by the creators of a media text, usually the dominant
reading of a text.

Prime Time: That part of a radio or television schedule expected to attract the largest audience.

Production: The industrial process of creating media texts as well as the people who are engaged in this process.

Production Values: Describes the quality of a media production proportional to the money and technology expended on the text.

Product Placement: The process by which manufacturers or advertisers pay a fee in order for branded products to be prominently displayed in a movie, TV show or other media production.

Propaganda: Any media text whose primary purpose is to openly persuade an audience of the validity of a particular point of view.

Psychographics: A more sophisticated form of demographics that includes information about the psychological and sociological characteristics of media consumers such as attitudes, values, emotional responses and ideological beliefs.

Representation: The process by which a constructed media text stands for, symbolizes, describes or represents people, places, events or ideas that are real and have an existence outside the text.

Software: The programs written for computers or the media texts that can be played on them.

Stereotypes: A form of media representation by which instantly recognized characteristics are used to label members of social or cultural
groups. While often negative, stereotypes can contain an element of truth and are used by the media to establish an instant rapport with
the audience.

Studio System: The factory-like production system in Hollywood by which movies were made from about 1925 to 1955.

Synergy: The combination of two separate media texts or products that share similar characteristics so that one helps market the other.

Technology: The machinery, tools and materials required to produce a media text. In media literacy terms, technology greatly impacts upon the
construction and connotation of a text.

Text: The individual results of media production: a movie, a TV episode, a book, an issue of a magazine or newspaper, an advertisement, an
album, etc.

Transparency: The quality of a media text by which it appears to be natural rather than constructed.

Vertical Integration: The process by which a media company acquires another elsewhere in the production process.

Virtual: Something which is a representation rather than the real thing. In advertising, the word "virtually" means "almost."

Word-of-mouth: Informal way in which media products become known by audiences.

World Wide Web: The World Wide Web is the network of pages of images, texts and sounds on the Internet which can be viewed using browser software.

 
Author Bio: 

Derek Boles is a longtime media literacy teacher in Canada and is a former editor of Mediacy, the newsletter of the Association for Media Literacy / Canada.

Aspen Institute Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy

Citation: 

Posted with permission of the Communications and Society Program of the Aspen Institute, Washington, D.C.

Sub Head: 

1992 gathering puts media literacy on U.S. educational agenda.

Body: 

As the movement for media literacy education emerged in the US in the early 1990s, there were many questions and opinions about what media literacy was all about. For the most part, media education activities were limited to grassroots efforts — an innovative teacher here, a pioneering school district there; some efforts were concerned about issues, like violence in the media or tobacco advertising; others were focused on skills, like video production and enabling young people to produce their own media.

So a landmark event in the history of media literacy in the USA was the December, 1992 gathering of 30 leaders from the fledgling movement for a leadership conference convened by the prestigious Aspen Institute / Communications and Society Program. Following extensive preparation over two years, the 3-day conference was held at the Institute's Wye Conference Center outside of Washington, DC, and provided an unparalleled opportunity for emerging leaders in the field to meet one another, share perspectives, establish relationships and, with skilled facilitation from the Aspen Institute staff, develop common definitions, engage in strategic planning and coordinate a plan of action.

The resulting Aspen Institute Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy proved to be an invaluable framework for collaboration and action over the next several years. Consisting of three interrelated documents, including an extensive background paper sketching important developments and contributions in the early years of the movement, the report was distributed widely to the worlds of education, media and philanthropy. With the highly respected Aspen Institute name attached, doors opened, calls were returned and funding proposals began to be approved. Many will attest that although media literacy was actually born in the US years before, it was this report that served as the official birth certificate.

Participants:

Ten years later, over two-thirds of the participants in the 1992 Aspen Conference continue their leadership in the field. The following list, however, is their affiliation at the time of the conference:

Wally Bowen, Citizens for Media Literacy / Asheville, North Carolina
David Considine, PhD, Appalachian State University / Boone, North Carolina
William Costanzo, Westchester Community College / New York
August Coppola / Los Angeles, CA
J. Francis Davis / Atlanta, GA
Allen De Bevoise / Los Angeles, CA
Roger Desmond, PhD, University of Hartford / CT
Deirdre Downs, Downs Media Education Center / Stockbridge, MA
Barry Duncan, Association for Media Literacy / Ontario, Canada
George Gerbner, PhD, Temple University / Philadelphia, PA
Steve Goodman, Educational Video Center / New York
Renee Hobbs, EdD, Babson College / Massachusetts
Karen Jaffe, KIDSNET / Washington, DC
Bobbi Kamil, Cable in the Classroom / Alexandra, VA
Roselle Kovitz, Nebraska ETV Network / Lincoln, NE
Deborah Leveranz, Southwest Alternate Media Project / Houston, TX
Kathryn Montgomery, Center for Media Education / Washington, DC
Marieli Rowe, National Telemedia Council / Madison, WI
Patrick Scott, Mediascope / Los Angeles, CA
Elizabeth Thoman, Center for Media Literacy / Los Angeles, CA
Kathleen Tyner, Strategies for Media Literacy / San Francisco, CA
Karen Webster, New Hampshire Public Television / Durham, NH
Robin White, National Alliance of Media Arts and Culture / Oakland, CA
Joe Zesbaugh, Pacific Mountain Network / Denver, CO

Aspen Institute:
Patricia Aufderheide, Rapporteur
Charles Firestone, Conference Moderator
Katharina Kopp, Program Coordinator

Funders:
Karin Egan, The Carnegie Corporation / New York
Ingrid Hamm, Bertelsmann Foundation / Gutersloh, Germany
Marc Vinson, Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation / Winston Salem, NC
Roger Desmond, PhD

 

 

What Media Literacy is NOT

Body: 

The following is a list of ideas to help explore and understand how media literacy is different from other literacies and what are some of the basic elements of a more comprehensive media education.

  • Media 'bashing' is NOT media literacy, however media literacy sometimes involves criticizing the media.
  • Merely producing media is NOT media literacy, although media literacy should include media production.
  • Just teaching with videos or CDRoms or other mediated content is NOT media literacy; one must also teach about media.
  • Simply looking for political agendas, stereotypes or misrepresentations is NOT media literacy; there should also be an exploration of the systems making those representations appear "normal."
  • Looking at a media message or a mediated experience from just one perspective is NOT media literacy because media should be examined from multiple positions.
  • Media Literacy does NOT mean "don't watch;" it means "watch carefully, think critically."

With thanks to Renee Hobbs, Chris Worsnop, Neil Andersen, Jeff Share and Scott Sullivan.

 
Footnotes: 

With thanks to Renee Hobbs, Chris Worsnop, Neil Andersen, Jeff Share and Scott Sullivan.

Brief History of Media Education, A

Article Images: 

Body: 

"How did we get here?" It's not just a question for those who are lost. Some think that we can better understand where we are today by looking at where we've been. With that idea in mind, I thought I would offer a short history of media education.

Media education can be divided into four distinct historical periods.

They are not difficult to remember, because the first one ran from about the year 0 until about the 1960's. The methodology was simple: educators ignored the media.

Even as late as the 1960's, when coffeehouses and folk music were all around, English teachers blithely delved into the study of ancient English madrigals with nary a mention of current troubadours. Students studied ancient Greek myths while Walt Disney was busy creating American myths of Davy Crockett or popularizing uniquely American fables. Even newspapers were not only ignored, but actually confiscated if a student had the audacity to bring them to class. Books were the only medium worth time and effort. And REAL books -- not those trashy paperbacks, either. English teachers taught books; music teachers taught classical music; history teachers taught ancient history in a way indistinguishable from teachers 500 years earlier.

When it became clear that popular mass media would not just wither and disappear, media education entered its second phase -- the inoculation phase. Just as your doctor would inject your body with the dead germs of some troublesome disease in order to protect your metabolism, teachers injected mass media into their courses to show how empty, silly, and value-less it was. It was an attempt to inoculate or protect students from the dangerous germs of current media culture. But they only injected dead or silly or stupid media messages -- it was easier to make fun of them that way.

You may remember Arthur Treacher on the Merv Griffin show reciting the lyrics to some rock and roll song with his uniquely upper-class British accent. He would, of course, choose songs like "Get A Job" (where the lyrics were "Sha-na-na-na. Yip. Yip. Yip") or "Da Do Ron Ron" to make the whole thing even funnier. Film study usually consisted of showing clips of a rebellious Marlon Brando or James Dean, with the inevitable message that the popular media were turning out a generation of delinquents. The term "multi-media" meant that your teacher would accept maybe a chart as part of your written report. But no pictures.

Making fun of the popular media and trying to point out how worthless it was didn't help, so the third phase tried to use the popular media as an enticement to get kids into areas really worthy of study. This was called the "suck them in" approach. "OK, class. Now that we've heard a song from Bob Dylan, a popular folk singer, let's see what other people did with the folk genre. Turn to page 222 for a discussion of ancient English madrigals."

Or they showed a clip from "West Side Story" just before they had you read "Romeo and Juliet," figuring that watching five minutes of the Sharks and the Jets would excite you enough for a five month study of Shakespeare and make it relevant. The study of current events was begun in social studies and students were allowed (if not encouraged) to actually read newspapers (but only for the news, not for the comics or sports or anything entertaining).

All of this happened in the space of about 20 years. Actually, in many places, it's still going on.

Media education today is in transition. We are beginning to realize that while "West Side Story" and "Romeo and Juliet" may have similar themes, each deals with the theme in different ways, in different times, with different storytelling techniques. Each is worthy of a closer study. And while a dramatic reading of rock lyrics as poetry is still an effective comedy routine, we understand today that lyrics are NOT poetry -- they are lyrics, a different medium.

We are beginning to realize that most Americans are not getting their information from books or even newspapers, but from television. And we're beginning to understand that wishing it were not so or ignoring the fact won't make it go away. We are moving education about the media into at least the 20th (if not the 21st) century, and teaching students about and with the media they know and use every day.

It is a difficult struggle, because there are still those who choose to ignore it, make fun of it, or use it to suck students in to a study of something else entirely. And we need to do media education while we continue to teach other, more traditional subjects, too (although perhaps we could spend just a LITTLE less time on English madrigals).

 
Author Bio: 

Bill Walsh is the A/V Media Specialist at Billerica High School, Billerica, MA. His column appears in the Billerica Minuteman newspaper weekly.

Pages