life

'America's Wish Book' Sells Dreams

Article Images: 

MediaValues

This article originally appeared in Issue# 57
Body: 

Printed and dispersed widely in the latter decades of the nineteenth century, advertisements provided a vehicle by which urban life could be presented to the countryside and urban industrial values promulgated among rural folks.

A notable example of this was the massive distribution of the Sears-Roebuck Catalog among American farmers from the 1890s on. For many in the countryside, the advertisements in the catalog provided the first glipse of the city. Upon the crowded, densely printed pages of the catalog -- dubbed "America's wish book" --rural people saw configurations which contrasted sharply with the open spaces with which they were familiar. Here urban density was depicted not as a condition of poverty and squalor, but as a site of abundance. Against rural traditions of scarcity and self-sufficiency, advertising -- like the Sears catalog -- projected urban consumption as a route toward cornucopian existence.

On each page, people confronted a quantity and variety of material goods that was previously unimaginable. Advertising was a kind of urban map, suggesting a world of streets paved with gold.

— Stuart Ewen, Advertising and the Development of Consumer Society

 

Television and Consumption

Article Images: 

MediaValues

This article originally appeared in Issue# 57
Body: 

Television has the connotation of plenitude; it seems to embody consumer society as a whole. In many households, a television set is on most of the day, the pictures and sound adding up to a steady accompaniment -- or is it a secondhand life?

Available at the touch of a button during almost all hours of the day, its range of choice at times appears to be synonymous with American freedom. For those who do not subscribe to cable, and for almost all the audience during most of the history of television, the flow even appears to be free (although consumers are paying higher prices for products to subsidize advertising).

Even the term "tube" expresses television's material of the good life, through commercials as well as the nonstop flow of programming. "Boob tube" expresses an unconscious connection with regressive oral dependence. Dependence on television is training for adaptation to consumer society.

On the one side, television watching, like the rest of the high-consumption way of life, is motivated by a search for pleasure, escape, and anesthesia; on the other, dependence on television is dependence on the prepackaged forms through which pleasure, escape, and anesthesia can be comfortably and conveniently procured.

— Todd Gitlin, Youth and Drugs: Society's Mixed Messages

 
Author Bio: 

Todd Gitlin is the author of 11 books and numerous articles in publications from the New York Times to Theory and Society. He is a professor of journalism and sociology at Columbia University, New York.

Deadly Persuasion: 7 Myths Alcohol Advertisers Want You to Believe

Article Images: 

MediaValues

This article originally appeared in Issue# 54-55
Body: 

"Absolut Magic" proclaims a print ad for a popular vodka. "Paradise found," headlines another. "Fairy tales can come true" says a third.

All these ads illustrate the major premise of alcohol advertising's mythology: Alcohol is magic, a magic carpet that can take you away. It can make you successful, sophisticated, sexy. Without it, your life would be dull, mediocre and ordinary.

Everyone wants to believe in happy endings. But as most of us know, the reality of alcohol for many people in our society is more like a horror story than a fairy tale. The liquid in the glass is definitely not a magic potion.

We are surrounded by the message that alcohol is fun, sexy, desirable and harmless. We get this message many times a day. We get it from the ads and, far more insidiously, we get it from the media, which depend upon alcohol advertising for a large share of their profits. Thanks to this connection, alcohol use tends to be glorified throughout the media and alcohol-related problems are routinely dismissed.

Alcohol is related to parties, good times, celebrations and fun, but it is also related to murder, suicide, unemployment and child abuse. These connections are never made in the ads. Of course, one would not expect them to be. The advertisers are selling their product and it is their job to erase any negative aspects as well as to enhance the positive ones. However, when the product is the nation's number one drug, there are consequences that go far beyond product sales.

Most people know that alcohol can cause problems. But how many realize that 10 percent of all deaths in the United States - including half of all homicides and at least one quarter of all suicides - are related to alcohol? The economic cost to the nation exceeds $100 billion a year. At least 13,000,000 Americans, about one out of 10, are alcoholic - the personal cost to them and their families is incalculable.

The tab for alcohol use doesn't end there. More than $2 billion a year - a sizable chunk of the over $90 billion the industry takes in annually - goes to prime the advertising and promotion pump and keep drinkers' money flowing freely. Problem drinkers and young people are the primary targets of these advertisers.

Of course, industry spokespeople disagree with this claim. Over and over again, their public statements assert that they are not trying to create new or heavier drinkers. Instead, they say they only want people who already drink to switch to another brand and to drink it in moderation. However, the most basic analysis of alcohol advertising reveals an emphasis on both recruiting new, young users and pushing heavy consumption of their products.

Indeed, advertising that encouraged only moderate drinking would be an economic failure. This becomes clear when you know that only 10 percent of the drinking-age population consumes over half of all alcoholic beverages sold. According to Robert Hammond, director of the Alcohol Research Information Service, if all 105 million drinkers of legal age consumed the official maximum "moderate" amount of alcohol - .99 ounces per day, the equivalent of about two drinks - the industry would suffer "a whopping 40 percent decrease in the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits."

Young Prospects

These figures make it clear that if alcoholics were to recover - i.e., stop drinking - the alcoholic beverage industry's gross revenue would be cut in half. I can't believe that industry executives want that to happen. On the contrary, my 15-year study of alcohol advertising makes me certain that advertisers deliberately target the heavy drinker and devise ads designed to appeal to him or her. As with any product, the heavy user is the best customer. However, when the product is a drug, the heavy user is often an addict.

Not all problem drinkers are alcoholics. Youthful drinking is frequently characterized by binges and episodes of drunkenness, making young people a lucrative market for alcohol producers. According to the 1989 National Institute on Drug Abuse survey of high school seniors, 33 percent of students reported that they had consumed five or more drinks on one occasion within the previous two weeks. This group is vulnerable to ad campaigns that present heavy drinking as fun and normal.

Media sell target audiences to the alcohol industry on a cost-per-drinker basis. "Cosmopolitan readers drank 21,794,000 glasses of beer in the last week… Isn't it time you gave Cosmopolitan a shot?" proclaims an ad aimed at the alcohol industry.

The primary purpose of the mass media is to deliver audiences to advertisers. It's worthwhile taking a closer look at how some of the common myths alcohol advertisers have created do this.

  1. Drinking is a risk-free activity.

  2. Ads featuring copy like "The Joy of Six" imply that it is all right to consume large quantities of alcohol. Light beer ("great taste") has been developed and heavily promoted not for the dieter but for the heavy drinker. It is "less filling," and therefore one can drink more.

    Ads like these tell the alcoholic and those around him or her that is all right, indeed splendid, to be obsessed by alcohol, to consume large amounts of it on a daily basis and to have it be a part of all one's activities. At the same time, all signs of trouble and any hint of addiction are erased.

    Every instance of use seems spontaneous, unique. The daily drinking takes place on yachts at sunset, not at kitchen tables in the morning. Bottles are magically unopened even when drinks have been poured. All signs of trouble and any hint of addiction are conspicuously avoided. There is no unpleasant drunkenness, only high spirits. Certainly alcohol-related problems such as alcohol-impaired driving, broken marriages, abused children, lost jobs, illness and premature death - are never even hinted at.

  3. You can't survive without drinking.

  4. "It separates the exceptional from the merely ordinary," is how a Piper champagne ad puts it. By displaying a vibrant, imbibing couple against a black and white non-drinking background crowd, the advertiser contrasts the supposedly alive and colorful world of the drinker with dull reality. The alcohol has resurrected the couple, restored them to life.

    In general, such advertising is expert at making the celebration of drinking itself - not a holiday, festivity or family event - a reason for imbibing ("Pour a Party," "Holidays were made for Michelob.")

    At the heart of the alcoholic's dilemma and denial is this belief, this certainty, that alcohol is essential for life, that without it he or she will literally die - or at best be condemned to a gray and two-dimensional wasteland, a half-life. These ads, and many others like them, present that nightmare as true, thus affirming and even glorifying one of the symptoms of the illness.

  5. Problem drinking behaviors are normal.

  6. A shot of a sunset-lit bridge, captioned "At the end of the day, even a bridge seems to be heading home for Red," is actually advertising not just Scotch, but daily drinking. Often symptoms of alcohol, such as the need for a daily drink, are portrayed as not only normal, but desirable. A Smirnoff ad captioned "Hurry Sundown" features a vampirish lady immobilized in a coffin-like setting awaiting the revivifying effects of a vodka gimlet.

    Slogans presenting drinking as "your own special island," and "your mountain hideaway" capitalize on the feelings of alienation and loneliness most alcoholics experience. Such ads seem to encourage solitary drinking, often one of the classic indicators of trouble with alcohol. They also distort the tragic reality that problem drinking increases - rather than alleviates - those feelings of isolation.

    Alcohol lies at the center of these ads, just as it is at the center of the alcoholic's life.


    "The trick for marketers is to project the right message in
    their advertisements to motivate those often motionless
    consumers to march down to the store or bar and
    exchange their money for a sip of liquor."
    Advertising Age

  7. Alcohol is a magic potion that can transform you.

  8. Alcohol advertising often spuriously links alcohol with precisely those attributes and qualities - happiness, wealth, prestige, sophistication, success, maturity, athletic ability, virility and sexual satisfaction - that the misuse of alcohol destroys.

    For example, alcohol is linked with romance and sexual fulfillment, yet it is common knowledge that drunkenness often leads to sexual dysfunction. Less well known is the fact that people with drinking problems are seven times more likely to be separated or divorced.

    Such ads often target young people, women and people of color, since members of these groups often feel powerless and are eager to identify with "successful" groups in our society. These ads sometimes connect "prestige" beverages with the aura of the rich and powerful or the goals of women's liberation.

    Ads and products aimed at young people deserve special mention in these days when many preteens start drinking in junior high school. Cartoon and animal characters such as Spuds MacKenzie, Anheuser-Busch's canine mascot, are not as innocent as they appear. In one Christmas campaign, Spuds appeared in a Santa Claus suit, promoting 12-packs of Bud Light beer. In the summer of 1990 he was cavorting with ninjas, drawing on the popularity of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles movie, a big hit with younger children.

    Ads that portray drinking as a passport to adulthood, coupled with transitional products such as high-proof milkshakes and chocolate sodas, can be very successful lures for young drinkers.

  9. Sports and alcohol go together.

  10. Alcohol consumption actually decreases athletic performance. However, numerous ads, like a Pabst Blue Ribbon poster showing a speeding bicyclist with a bottle of beer on her basket, wrongly imply that sports and alcohol are safely complementary activities. Others feature sponsorship of a wide range of sporting events or endorsements by sports stars.

  11. If these products were truly dangerous, the media would tell us.

  12. Most media are reluctant to bite the hand that feeds them by spending $2 billion annually on advertising and promotion. Media coverage of the "war on drugs" seldom mentions the two major killers, alcohol and nicotine. From the coverage, one would assume that cocaine was the United States' most dangerous drug. However, while cocaine, heroin and other illegal drugs are linked with about 20,000 deaths a year, alcohol contributes to at least 100,000 and cigarettes more than 390,000 - or more than 1,000 a day.

    Although many media feature occasional stories about alcoholism, they usually treat it as a personal problem and focus on individual treatment solutions. Reports that probe alcohol's role in violence and other chronic problems are rare, while the role advertising plays in encouraging its use is almost never discussed.

  13. Alcoholic beverage companies promote moderation in drinking.

  14. The current Budweiser "moderation" campaign says, "Know when to say when," as opposed to "Know when to say no." In the guise of a moderation message, this slogan actually suggests to young people that drinking beer is one way to demonstrate their control. It also perpetuates the myth that alcoholics are simply people who "don't know when to say when," irresponsibly engaging in willful misconduct, rather than people who are suffering from a disease that afflicts at least one in 10 drinkers.

    Most of these programs are designed to encourage young people not to drive drunk. Although this is a laudable goal, it is interesting to note that few of the alcohol industry programs discourage or even question drunkenness per se. The tragic result is that many young people feel it is perfectly all right to get drunk, as long as they do not get behind the wheel of a car.

    In any case, we might be better off without programs designed by the alcohol industry to promote ideas about "responsible" drinking that in fact subtly promote myths and damaging attitudes. For example, one program by Miller beer defines moderate drinking as up to four drinks a day. Copy for a Budweiser program called "The Buddy System" defines drunkenness as having "too much of a good time." Doesn't this imply that being sober is having a bad time, that being drunk and having a good time go together? Even the industry's "moderation" messages imply the advantages of heavy drinking.

    One of the chief symptoms of the disease of alcoholism is the denial that there is a problem. In general, as a society we tend to deny the illness and to support the alibi system of the alcoholic. Advertising encourages this denial.

    It may be impossible to prove conclusively that alcohol advertising affects consumption, but it clearly affects attitudes about drinking. The ads contribute to an environment of social acceptance of high-risk drinking and denial of related problems. In addition, media dependence on alcohol advertising discourages full and open discussion of the many problems associated with alcohol.

    A major comprehensive effort is needed to prevent alcohol-related problems. Such an effort must include education, mass media campaigns, increased availability of treatment programs, and more effective deterrence policies. It must also include public policy changes that take into account that the individual acts within a social, economic and cultural environment that profoundly influences his or her choices. Such changes would include raising taxes on alcohol, putting clearly legible warning labels on the bottles and regulating the advertising.

    Above all, we must become fully engaged in the struggle to solve alcohol-related problems. We must stop supporting the denial that is at the heart of the illness that alcohol advertising both perpetuates and depends upon both in the individual and in society as a whole.

    What can be done? We can investigate the extent to which the media are influenced by their dependence on alcohol advertising. We can consider the possibility of further restricting or banning all alcohol advertising, as some other countries have done. We can insist on equal time for information commercials in the broadcast media. We can raise the taxes on alcohol and use the extra revenue to fund programs to prevent and treat the illness and educate the public. We can become more aware of the real messages in the ads and work to teach their implications and consequences to those we love and care for.

 
Author Bio: 

Jean Kilbourne is internationally recognized for her pioneering work on alcohol and tobacco advertising and the image of women in advertising. She is the creator of several award-winning films, including Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women, Calling the Shots: Advertising Alcohol, and Slim Hopes: Advertising & the Obsession with Thinness. Her book Can't Buy My Love: How Advertising Changes the Way We Think and Feel won the Distinguished Publication Award from the Association for Women in Psychology. She is a Visiting Research Scholar at the Wellesley Centers for Women.

Our Culture of Addiction

Article Images: 

MediaValues

This article originally appeared in Issue# 54-55
Sub Head: 

Why This Issue on Drugs Doesn't Cover Crack

Body: 

"No street-corner crack dealer ever had a better line
than the one Madison Avenue delivers at every commercial break: Buy now! Quick thrills!"

- Barbara Ehrenreich, Ms.

When the Media&Values editorial staff first started thinking and reading about an issue on media and drugs in the middle of 1990, there was no shortage of material. It seemed that every magazine in America had done a cover story on crack houses, "the Colombian connection," and, above all, "the drug war."

Yet as we read, we had a feeling of disquiet. The problem of illegal drugs, with their physical and mental wreckage and accompanying crime, was serious. But it seemed only the tip of the iceberg. While jumping gladly onto the drug war bandwagon, few members of the media seemed to have insights that could explain why drugs had become such a problem. Nor did any of them seem to see themselves as anything but neutral bystanders.

An article by well-known journalist Pete Hamill provided a clue. Why, he pondered, has drug addiction become a severe problem only in the last few decades? Is the problem cyclical, as some say? Or have there been other cultural changes that encourage addictive patterns in society at large?

The answer, to Hamill, is television. Obviously, television is an important cultural element that became prominent over the last 30 to 40 years. Like drugs, television provides what he calls "an unearned high," a rush of vicarious feeling. Its addictive qualities have been pointed out by many experts. And, again, like drug addicts, TV devotees tend to become alienated and isolated from the outside world.

I don't want to reproduce Hamill's whole argument here. You can turn the page and read it for yourself. But it caused us to wonder: Instead of being an innocent and noble reporter, is the media instead a co-participant in society's addiction?

What we see - not only in the media but all around us - is an expectation that life will be easy, simple and exciting, for everybody and at all times. The reality that life is a race, a challenge and at times a struggle has been replaced by demands for immediate fulfillment. Instead of pursuing happiness, we want it to fall in our laps.

Addiction feeds, and feeds on, this fantasy. But addictive behavior comes in many guises. Increasingly, it is obvious that the "problem" with drugs is not drugs, but addiction.

A Subtle Seduction

The way to get a handle on it is not by covering the criminality of crack cocaine but by uncovering the subtle ways tobacco and alcohol advertising entice us to addiction. Although legal (but frequently lethal) tobacco and alcohol provide a valuable case study of how mass media both reflect and shape our world and our worldview.

That's not to say people's desire to buy easy solutions to their problems is new. Nineteenth Century snake oil salesmen sometimes scored huge successes. But today's sellers of dreams aren't bound by the confines of a medicine wagon.

It's no surprise that advertising and the media grew up together. And now that the whiskey drummer beats a society-wide drum and the cigar store Indian has been replaced by the Marlboro man's myth, the advertisers of these products have a huge advantage. Not only can they reach us all, any time of day or night, but we bring an advertising-ready sensibility to their messages. Our familiarity with their images has bred, not contempt, but a dangerous lack of indignation. This is made abundantly clear by our blasé reactions to what is now known as "image marketing," the commonly accepted practice in which companies associate themselves with something culturally worthy, hoping the positive image will rub off.

ADBUSTERS Quarterly, the Canadian environmental and media magazine, helps put advertisers' duplicity into context: "Imagine crack suppliers sponsoring the local ballet or orchestra. The name brand Cocaine plastered over racing cars and the backs of famous athletes. Better yet: heroin suppliers running serious little magazine spots to suggest that the U.S. Bill of Rights really means that advertising of any product, even a lethal one, is legal."

The truth is, today's alcohol and cigarette advertising has direct links to the pioneering efforts of modern advertising's founders in the '20s and '30s. As recounted in Richard Pollay's article "Blowing Away the PR Smokescreen" on page 13, today's Virginia Slim's ads are the direct descendents of early ads that linked cigarette smoking with women's liberation. Examples aimed at other groups are many.

How do they do it? As Jean Kilbourne explains on p. 10, advertising - and alcohol advertising particularly - survives on the creation of myths. When the product has risks, the fairy tales advertisers tell can be a screen for real dangers. Part of our acceptance of these myths undoubtedly lies in the familiarity of the products themselves. Outside the Americas at least, alcohol has been part of human life and culture for thousands of years. The indigenous American herb, tobacco, with its 350,000 annual tobacco-related U.S. death rate (more than 2.7 million worldwide) may be the Native Americans' best revenge for conquest and oppression. But its use in Western culture still goes back centuries.

The risks of tobacco usage weren't well established in the '20s. The perils of alcoholism, on the other hand, were perceived as the kind of moral and physical threat that deserved a constitutional amendment. The poor success of the alcohol ban that it mandated still gives pause to would-be prohibitionists.

While the persistence of human foibles tends to remain the same, much else has changed. One major shift is the pervasiveness of media images in our lives. The media wave that washes over each of us every day tends to carry all before it. We're so accustomed to the culture of addiction surrounding us that we don't pause to take a second look at the misleading messages of alcohol and tobacco advertisers. Awakening to the problem is the first step. But society's remedies shouldn't stop there.

Banning or otherwise restricting advertising for alcohol and especially cigarettes has been recommended by many experts, while others (particularly alcoholic beverage and tobacco companies) question whether such limitations to commercial speech would be constitutional. On page 8, First Amendment expert Steven Shiffrin makes a persuasive case for the constitutionality of a ban or other possible restrictions on cigarette and alcohol advertising. After doing this issue, we think legislation enacting such measures deserves more discussion and action.

In the meantime, other groups are exploring other ways of discouraging "business-as-usual" for the multi-product conglomerates that tobacco companies have become. Marshalling techniques that became familiar in the fight against investment in South Africa, religious groups, pension fund administrators and individuals - including such major investors as Harvard, Johns Hopkins and the City University of New York - are using shareholder challenges, divestiture of tobacco stock and review of advertising practices to put pressure on companies that continue to profit from tobacco sales. The campaign recently expanded to challenge companies that do any business with tobacco conglomerates.

Boycotts are another avenue of protest being explored by some groups. The Media Foundation, publishers of ADBUSTERS Quarterly, called for a Philip Morris boycott, not just of tobacco products, but of selected items from the major food brands the company produces. ADBUSTERS also called for a "dirty dozen" boycott of the 12 largest U.S. magazines (including Time, Newsweek, People and TV Guide) that accept cigarette ads.

Such efforts require careful organization and maintenance, but have often proven effective over time. If nothing else, negative publicity may help speed the eventual demise of the tobacco-based profit center for these companies.

But boycotts, corporate challenges and advertising bans ultimately depend for their effectiveness on breaking the power of media images - the main goal of the media literacy movement. Even before advertising bans pass Congress or boycotts have time to work, everyone who picks up a magazine or turns on a television set can apply the process of what media literacy theorists call "deconstruction" to the alcohol and tobacco ads they see.

The Reflection/Action resource on pages 30-31, is a perfect tool for this purpose. The workshop process that goes along with this issue is another excellent way to recognize and confront the manipulative images that make tobacco and alcohol advertising so effective. Taking a second look at these ads can help them lose their effectiveness forever. An example lies in the ready acceptance of the advertising mindset that creates cartoon characters like Camel's Joe Cool and Bud Light's Spuds MacKenzie. Unless we stop to question their appeal to the children who are too young for the products they advertise, they seem innocuous.

Like most people, I'm hardly impervious to media images. My discovery of Bogart/Bacall and Bette Davis movies probably had a lot to do with my starting smoking as a '60s college student. I quit before my father's death from lung cancer in 1982, but even after that, until I began working on this issue I still took cigarette ads for granted.

I never will again.

 
Author Bio: 

Rosalind Silver, who started as a volunteer writer for Media&Values magazine in 1983, was named editor in 1989 and continued on staff until the magazine ceased publication in 1993. She holds an MA in Journalism from the University of Southern California. She is a copy editor on the Press Telegram, Long Beach, California.

Brands R Us: How Advertising Works

Article Images: 

MediaValues

This article originally appeared in Issue# 51
Body: 

Hyundai tells us that their cars make sense, Apple Computer offers us the power to be our best, and most of us don't believe a word of it. The fact is, when all is said and done, most people don't believe, don't remember, don't even notice, most advertising. This has always been so and always will be so. The vast majority of advertising is ineffective and inefficient.

And yet, there is a direct connection between a society's (or individual's) levels of exposure to advertising and the levels of consumption. How can this be? If advertising is inefficient, if 90 percent of all advertising is neither seen nor remembered by most people (according to surveys), if two minutes after being exposed to a particular message or brand I can no longer remember either the brand or the message, then where's the connection? How does something so banal and benign impact my consumption patterns and habits?

The message cited above for Hyundai automobiles ("Cars That Make Sense") has little or no effect either upon our personal lives or even Hyundai's sales overall. And we could say the same thing about thousands of other individual and isolated advertiser efforts. But the Hyundai advertising, combined with Apple Computer's advertising, combined with advertising for Tide detergent and Chivas Regal and RCA and Johnson's Floor Wax and the limited -time specials at your local department store or supermarket, has a very powerful collective effect indeed: it instructs us to Buy!

And it gives us, via lighthearted entertainment, permission to ignore the long-term consequences of our purchasing decisions by suggesting to us that we should not take any of this too seriously. (We shouldn't take a spilled glass of water too seriously, either. But a flood is a totally different matter.)

Advertising's real message, to buy and to buy ever more, to replace what we have rather than repair what we have, at one time served us well. When we were smaller in numbers, when we were still growing, still searching for a collective identity, when personal prosperity was touted as the primary reason for being alive, private property the only form of wealth, and when we were naive enough to believe it all, consumption and the ability to consume (choosing our livelihoods on the basis of whether or not it provided us with that ability!) was not only a way of life, it was a respectable one at that.

But we are no longer small in numbers. And we are no longer that naive. We can plainly see that advertising's collective power and our collective response to it has had, and continues to have, a profound and adverse effect upon our personal lives and upon the planet we share.

But pointing a finger at the advertising industry will change nothing. Wishing and hoping that the advertising industry will lose its innocence and suddenly leap into modern times in recognition of the situation we are all in is futile. And while the advertising industry is part and parcel of an industrial civilization now in decline, this doesn't mean we should expect the number of advertising messages and collective power of those messages to also decline in the very near future. If anything, it means we can expect an increase in the number of those messages. For the advertising industry, along with the main body of industrial society, is struggling for survival. It may be drowning, but it has not yet sunk. And in a last-ditch effort to save itself, it will flail about more wildly and make more noise than ever, as we might expect from any drowning individual.

No, what must change is us. What must change is how we see advertising in the context of the modern moment. We must recognize that its influence upon our lives and our well-being is in direct proportion to the amount of exposure in our lives, and that this exposure is an event unto itself, an experience separate from whether or not we respond to or believe individual messages.

High consumption has far more impact upon our environment than type of consumption. Buying much less and driving much less is better than just switching from plastic to paper or from "normal" unleaded to "super" unleaded. One of the first steps we must take towards consuming fewer goods is to consume less advertising.

Six Ways to Reduce Advertising in Your Life

Greater awareness of advertising's role in your life can help make you a conscious, instead of an automatic, consumer:

     

  1. Don't be a walking advertisement.
    Remove those labels, tags and other symbols from your jeans and steer clear of T-shirt advertising, "alligator" shirts and clothing with designer logos. Why should you be an unpaid billboard?

     

     

  2. Keep your counter clear of brand names.
    Whenever possible, transfer liquid soaps, cereals, cookies, nuts, juices and the like from their brand-identified store-bought containers into plain, general-purpose jars and cannisters. Or remove brand I.D. labels from store containers (but make sure the product is still clearly identifiable).

     

     

  3. Take the road less traveled.
    Avoiding main highways and using local streets can help you sidestep the major arteries and commercial avenues in your locale. This will go a long way towards reducing your exposure to outdoor advertising and may even help you get to know your town or city a little better.

     

     

  4. Reduce or eliminate junk mail.
    Department stores and local merchants will stop sending you flyers and other advertising if you ask them to. Many local direct-mail associations will also serve as clearinghouses for a request to eliminate junk mail. Check your phone directory for local listings or write to the national organization, Junk Mail Busters, Ste. 5038, 4 Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, CA 94111.

     

     

  5. Divest your possessions of brand names.
    Applicances, stereo components, computers, TV sets, tele-phones, sometimes even furniture almost all display prominent logos, but you don't have to live with them. Often you can cover them with tape or water-soluble colors, unscrew them or peel them away without damaging the item. (When resale value and slight damage are not concerns, you can obliterate them.)

     

     

  6. Keep your branded items hidden.
    Store toothpastes in the medicine cabinet, detergents out of sight and return everyday foods or other frequently-used items that can't be transferred to alternate containers to cabinets immediately after use.

     

There are probably dozens of other ways to lower advertising consumption. See how many you can think of. Remember: the idea is to keep exposure to logos and brand names in your household as low as possible and to reduce it whenever and wherever possible.

It's impossible to totally eliminate advertising from your life completely, and if you could, you wouldn't want to. Much advertising serves a useful function by providing information about products and services, supporting mass distribution and helping to keep prices of some products affordable.

But ad consumption reduction can start to change the consumption-oriented mindset that makes brand names a source of status and an end in themselves.

Implementation of just one or two of these suggestions can help you begin to learn how to consume products, not advertising. And after all, isn't that the idea?

 

 
Author Bio: 

Stephen Garey is a former advertising industry creative executive, now retired and focusing on fine art photography. His photography can be viewed at www.pbase.com/smgarey.

When I Grow Up: Children and the Work-World of Television

Article Images: 

MediaValues

This article originally appeared in Issue# 47
Body: 

Television's portrayal of the work world may have changed over the years, but the message absorbed by many children and teenagers, particularly those who watch a lot of television, is not always a positive or realistic one.

The first thing that should strike a viewer as odd about professional life on television is that very few people do any real work at all. Instead, we see lawyers, doctors, police officers, private investigators, and business tycoons spending a great deal of time talking to one another - generally socializing on the job.

When they are working, we often get to see only the most glamorous aspects of what they do for a living: chasing around in sports cars, fancy boats or airplanes, performing life-saving surgery, arguing sensational legal cases in court or hunting down dangerous criminals with sophisticated weapons. The day-to-day routine of most jobs, the behind-the-scenes type of work, is rarely seen at all.

Mundane Reality

Before the era of television, children tended to identify with the kinds of employment they were exposed to on a regular basis. Career aspirations were often gender-oriented (girls were socialized toward the passive, nurturing, indoor jobs and boys toward active, adventurous, outdoor ones), but apart from the sexism their aspirations were based on real-life examples.

Today, television has made many jobs seem mundane and unattractive, while exaggerating the allure of a few professions. Viewers are attracted by careers portrayed as ultra glamorous, exciting, well-paid and trendy. Often children want to be what they see on television - news anchors, film stars, lawyers and corporate executives.

Television writers seem to have forgotten the old adage that a good plumber can earn as much as a doctor. We don't see television programs glamorizing the lives of plumbers, electricians, carpenters or other artisans.

Unrealistic Expectations

Not long ago I asked some 18 year-old media students what they expected from work in the media industry, and I compared their answers with those from cross section of media professionals. The students grossly underrated the amount of clerical, administrative and paperwork they would have to do on a daily bases, and they overestimated the amount of fame, fortune and fun they would reap from their work.

This is not a definitive picture of how naïve young people sometimes are about careers that have all the trappings of wealth and prestige, but it indicates that the work world is often far less glamorous and rewarding than television frequently leads us to believe.

What is more, the motivations that people in real life suggest will get us to the very top are different from those depicted on television. Parents and teachers usually encourage children to study longer, work harder and become more disciplined in order to achieve their ambitions. In contrast, television often implies that they should "wise up" to destructive, unethical ways of getting ahead in their professional lives.

Lifestyles of the Ultrarich

The prime-time soaps, in particular, encourage professional aspirations with expensive veneers on the outside and rotten values on the inside. They take the glamorous aspects of work to extremes by depicting the lives of the ultrarich. The programs' protagonists live in sumptuous mansions or designer homes, drive top-of-the-line imported cars, hop around in private jets and indulge their whims and fancies with the ultimate in conspicuous consumption.

Of course, in real life only a small minority of people live in such luxury, yet to many viewers this lifestyle appears to be widespread, perhaps even inevitable. Children and teenagers, eager to emulate their television heroes and heroines, may even feel that life owes them such an existence, and feel resentment if it does not live up to these expectations.

An equally disturbing implication of the soaps is that characters' unethical behavior contributes to the amassing and protecting of monumental fortunes. The programs suggest that the work ethic is an outdated, useless value because wealth and power are not achieved through hard work but by treacherous and devious means. Every week on a repetitive basis we are shown that murder, blackmail, physical bullying, psychological intimidation, sexual coercion, dishonesty and subterfuge are acceptable behavior - at least for those who want to become rich and stay rich.

These shows also offer particularly offensive stereotypes of the way women accumulate wealth and status. The message is insulting and clear - successful women should not be taken seriously; they did not reach the top because of merit but through their powers of seduction and manipulation. The stereotype that women who climb the corporate ladder are calculating and ruthless is not new; it has been around for many years. What makes this message particularly distressing today is that 52 percent of the population are women, 49 percent of whom work outside the home, many having studied and worked long and hard to enter professional jobs.

Positive Role Models

But the picture is not entirely gloomy, nor do I want to suggest that striving for wealth and power is all bad, or that no television character does an honest day's work for an honest day's pay.

Television is first and foremost an entertainment medium and it makes no promises to be realistic or serious. It offers us a picture of how people make money that is an exaggerated and sometimes amusing caricature of reality, and for everything negative on prime time there is usually something positive to savor as well.

To place the negative influences in their proper perspective, I should add that some newer shows, as well as those that have been around for several seasons, offer us characters who live up to all the best ideals of moral and ethical behavior - fine examples of principled, trustworthy, loyal caring individuals who are positive role models for our children. They show that with hard work and commitment a person can have a comfortable existence without lying, cheating or bullying.

The characters who come to mind include detectives such as Thomas Magnum, Rick and A.J. Simon; mystery writer Jessica Fletcher of Murder She Wrote; a dozen protagonists in situation comedies like Kate and Allie, The Golden Girls and The Cosby Show. Even the prime-time soaps feature one or two redeeming characters such as Mack and Karen of Knots Landing.

Some especially rewarding professional portrayals have been seen on Cagney and Lacey, Hotel, thirtysomething, A Year in the Life, St. Elsewhere and the new Star Trek. Several admirable lawyers have also been featured, like Matlock and the better-intentioned members of the trendy crowd from L.A. Law.

Socializing the Young

We simply need to remind ourselves that children watch a great many programs designed primarily for adults. The typical two to 5-year-old watches some five hours of prime time a week; the average six to 11-year-old devotes about six hours each week to prime-time shows, and 12 to 17-year-olds watch about seven hours a week of prime-time programs.

Although the relationship between what is shown on television and what is absorbed by viewers depends largely on demographics, family structure, social values and parent-child interaction, on a long-term basis television has subtle impacts, particularly on those who rely on it heavily (if not entirely) for their picture of reality.

Actual work experience is the only antidote, but children too young for it can be helped to see that what appears on the screen is only a facsimile, not reality. Comments about favorable shows, sharing of adults' own work life and contact with real-life professionals can all help broaden children's experience before they join the work force.

Adults have a responsibility to mediate the messages of television and to discuss issues central to children's understanding of the diversity of human experience. Work is just one element of that experience, but it's an important one. We must help children build positive, realistic career aspirations, understand how to achieve those goals, and help them to lead productive and satisfying personal and professional lives.

 
Author Bio: 

Susanna Barber is the chair of the Mass Communication Department at Menlo College in Atherton, California.

Can TV Characters Pay Their Bills?

Article Images: 

MediaValues

This article originally appeared in Issue# 47
Body: 

Bombarded by media images of glamorous jobs with big rewards and little or no effort, young people may conclude work is always exciting and extravagant lifestyles are easy to achieve. Class or family discussion of the following questions can help both young people and adults focus on the contrast between reality and the work world of television.

  • Discuss what favorite characters do for a living, how much time they spend working and how their work or labor is portrayed. What do their annual salaries appear to be? Could real people earning such salaries afford the lifestyle (furniture, clothes, vacations, amusements, etc.) portrayed?
  • Listen for dialogue concerning actual prices or costs of goods. What is mentioned? Is it realistic?
  • Look closely for ways in which currency is actually exchanged. How do television characters acquire possessions? Do they leave tips in restaurants? Do they jump out of cabs, or stop and pay the driver?
  • Do TV characters ever get the blues from routine tasks? How much of their work is delegated to them and supervised by others?
  • For a further activity, view a favorite program with a professional who works in the same field as the TV character. Afterward, question him/her about how closely the show relates to actual work.
 

Canada Offers Ten Classroom Approaches to Media Literacy

Article Images: 

Citation: 

Reprinted with permission of the Association for Media Literacy / Canada.

Body: 

The following article is from the introduction to the Media Literacy Resource Guide published by the Ontario Ministry of Education in 1989 to guide the implementation of media literacy in language arts in Ontario high schools. The guide was written by members of the Association for Media Literacy / Canada.

Introduction

The teacher's attitude to the mass media and to students as avid media consumers is crucial to the success of any media literacy program. Most students bring to the classroom an enormous amount of information about and experience with the media -- in many cases, far more than do their teachers. While it is important for teachers to start where their students are, it is also necessary for them to lead their students to where they are not.

This guide stresses teaching inductively and beginning whenever possible with students' direct experiences with the media. The basic method of media studies is that of a "spiral curriculum", a concept developed by educator Jerome Bruner. The fundamental principle of this method is that the key concepts of any discipline can be taught in some form to students at any level. Thus, concepts initially introduced in simple form at the elementary level are, in successive years, explored, developed, and extended in increasingly sophisticated ways as the student matures and develops.

To take a relatively simple example, elementary school pupils might begin to explore the concept of the commercial implications of media by talking about television programs they watch and, with the guidance of the teacher, distinguishing between program material and commercials, identifying the different purposes of each. At a later stage they could look at a variety of commercials aimed at children, discussing their reactions to them and perhaps beginning to evaluate their effectiveness. They could also talk about what they would put in commercials for children if they were making them. Older children could begin to analyze the techniques and appeals of commercials, planning and storyboarding some of their own. They could also explore the relationship between commercials and programming, perhaps examining the link between children's cartoon characters and sales of related products such as dolls or clothing. As they progress through the educational system, they may move on, for example, to more detailed examinations of commercials; studies of the effects of economic considerations on programming, content, and techniques; or research into issues such as the effects of ownership and control media.

Because students are immersed in media, the role of the teacher must be that of a facilitator and a co-learner. The teacher must help students to negotiate meaning, engage in inquiry and research, identify patterns, and create their own media productions.

Stress the Positive

It is important to stress the positive features of the mass media rather than to dwell at length on the negative. It is also essential that students be encouraged to explore the values and the tastes that are relevant to their own immediate cultural context. This fundamental premise of values education implies that the teacher should not be imposing a set of elitist values on the class. (For example, the teacher should avoid holding up "Masterpiece Theater" and PBS as caviar and everything else as junk food for the masses.)

It may be difficult to find socially redeeming values in many of the programs that have high audience ratings or in rock videos, but it is these very examples that our students are eager to discuss. Using media literacy in critical discussion, the teacher can empower students to discover meaning on their own, thus giving them critical autonomy.

Because of the immense diversity in the media and the sheer quantity of information, teachers may feel overwhelmed. This resource guide offers a whole range of coping strategies. First, many avenues for media literacy are already available. For example, most subject disciplines offer approaches to the topic, and many of the activities suggested in this document are ideally suited to the development of speaking, listening, and writing skills. Second, this guide encourages a plurality of approaches, including the application of interdisciplinary perspectives and critical- and creative- thinking strategies.

By necessity, media teachers will be eclectic. As well, the constantly changing content of the media and of popular culture, along with their many new and evolving forms and technologies, will necessitate the concept of "a movable text" that is made up by the teacher, the class, or both together. Such a text will encompass current newspaper and magazine clippings, new video, audiotapes, record albums, and resource people from the community. In such an enterprise, it should be evident that media study is ideally suited to the collaborative strength that is gained from team teaching.

To avoid duplicating activities and audio-visual materials each year, teachers, department heads, and principals will have to plan a coherent and, in many cases, a sequential media-studies program. This may prompt the formation of board media-literacy committees, which can organize workshops for teachers and design media curricula especially suited to local needs.

Teachers not familiar with essential equipment such as slide projectors and the video-cassette recorder will need to develop the competency required to make media literacy worthwhile for their students. For example, effective use of the freeze frame or the scanning mechanism on a VCR can enhance the use of video considerably.

Throughout the guide there are many opportunities for practical media production, an important dimension that complements the application of the key concepts and decoding exercises. Practical activities should never become an end in themselves; otherwise, the critical inquiry that is central to media study may be ignored.

SPECIFIC APPROACHES

  1. The Inquiry Model
    The inquiry model is a structured framework that will help students recognize basic issues and provide strategies for developing subject content. This model helps to stimulate open questioning and encourages students to be intellectually curious about the world; it also demands that they have the proper tools for meaningful research and discussion. Since many of the topics that interest students (e.g., censorship, bias in news coverage, popular culture trends) need to be focused as soon as possible, this methodology is ideally suited to media study.

    The inquiry model is especially suited to the introduction of media-literacy activities in the classroom. For example, one can easily apply the model to a provocative short film, a television documentary, or an excerpt from a feature-film video that reveals a powerful moral dilemma. Through an intense shared experience that raises a whole range of issues, students are enabled to see the value of a structured framework for facilitating focused research and critical thinking.

    The inquiry model might be used, for example, to explore the following question: "Why do Canadians seem to prefer American media?" The following alternative solutions might be investigated:

    • Media content, from films to television, is predominantly American in origin.
    • American programs are generally cheaper to buy; have better production values, which reflect lavish budgets; and have a faster pace than do most Canadian programs.
    • Quality Canadian programs may reflect our identity, but most Canadians' indifference about or insecurity in this area compels them to avoid endeavours that hold up the mirror to our society.
    • Intense competition in the United States ensures that only the most salable commercial products are seen.

    Students might then explore the alternatives by collecting data in the following ways:

    • Statistics are available in resources on the Canadian film industry, such as Cinema Canada [Editor's note: is no longer in publication] and from the reports of various commissions on broadcasting and the film industry.
    • Students could check with Canadian television networks on the comparative costs of buying an American show – especially those in reruns – and of producing a Canadian series. Students could watch some typical Canadian shows and compare them with the American product in order to notice differences in themes, characterization, and pace.
    • Students could check the ratings of one of the better Canadian television series and the box-office take for some of our critically acclaimed films. In addition, by formulating a questionnaire and having a cross section of people answer it, students could determine whether the results confirm or deny the notion that Canadians are indifferent to or insecure about seeing their identity portrayed.
    • Students could write or talk to Canadian media professionals regarding the allegations about the benefits of competition in the United States.
  2. Critical-thinking strategies
    The critical-thinking movement in the 1980s has helped to provide some important strategies for teachers of media literacy. According to Robert Ennis, critical thinking refers to a body of intellectual skills and abilities that enable one to decide rationally what to believe or do. It also includes a set of values: the pursuit of truth, fairness or open-mindedness, empathy, autonomy, and self-criticism. A "strong sense" critical thinker is one who strives to live in accordance with the values of critical thinking and who is able to think dialogically. A typical mass-media issue involves a blending of intellectual, affective, and moral responses. Many issues carried in the media demand that we move back and forth between opposing points of view. It is here that good dialogical thinking can help us out. Dialogical thinking involves a dialogue or extended exchange between points of view or frames of reference. The following checklist of typical critical- thinking skills is reproduced from Robert Ennis, "A Concept of Critical Thinking," Harvard Educational Review, Winter 1962: 38.

    Critical-Thinking Checklist:

    • distinguishing between verifiable facts and value claims
    • determining the reliability of a claim or source
    • determining the accuracy of a statement distinguishing between warranted and unwarranted claims
    • detecting bias identifying stated and unstated assumptions
    • recognizing logical inconsistencies
    • determining the strength of an argument

    Teachers interested in more information on these approaches should consult current books and articles on critical thinking in educational journals such as Educational Leadership and Phi Delta Kappan.

  3. Values education
    The mass media are an ideal resource for the discussion of moral dilemmas, the development of moral reasoning, and the use of techniques such as values clarification. Dialogical reasoning, which has been described as an important part of critical thinking, can play a significant role in discussions of topics such as the pros and cons of the mass media, government control of media, censorship, advertising, and the moral values identified in popular television and films. Consult the bibliography in the ministry's resource guide Personal and Societal Values (Toronto: Ministry of Education, Ontario, 1983) for further information on values education.
  4. Media from the perspective of subject disciplines
    In relation to media-literacy analysis in a subject context, it is important to stress that teachers will need to move beyond conceiving of media simply as audio-visual aids. Ideas that teachers can use to incorporate media literacy into their classes include:
    • English – Film-literature comparisons, script writing and multimedia thematic units (ie. exploring how themes such as the nature of courage, the hero and comedy are expressed in various mediums).
    • Social Sciences
      • History – Presentation of historical figures, historical bias and point-of-view, the marketing of politicians, and propoganda.
      • Geography – Comparisons of the images of cities in films and TV to the socio-economic realities of those cities; deconstruction of travel films; bias in films made by governments or corporations; depiction of countries as portrayed by governments vs. "structured absences," images that are not included in the official portrayal.
    • Family Studies – The representation of the family in advertising and film; sexuality and sexual stereotyping in the media; and the culture of violence.
    • Science and Technology– In addition to their treatment in science fiction, there are numerous references to science and technology in newspapers, films, magazines, and novels. Television, in both news and entertainment programs, constantly packages scientific issues and information. Some of this material can be integrated into the science curriculum by pointing out connections between the scientific issues raised by the media and the scientific principles underlying them. Students can also explore the strengths and limitations of the presentation of science topics in the media.
    • Visual Arts – The possibilities for media literacy in the visual arts are enormous. Many of the decisions made in the media are based on aesthetic considerations. The role of art in a mass-media-dominated society is of major concern for aspiring artists. Art teachers need to assess more than just the principles of pleasing form when looking at media; they need to consider all of the aspects that have been outlined in the section on key concepts in Visual Arts, Intermediate and Senior Divisions, Curriculum Guideline (Toronto: Ministry of Education, Ontario, 1986).
    • Music – Students are immersed in rock music and rock videos. While some music teachers use rock as a resource, many consider it inappropriate for their music courses. However, there are many valuable connections that can be made through the comparison of traditional and popular music. The popular-music enables music teachers to help their students investigate the aesthetics, the value messages, and the commercial implications of this pervasive form.
    • Physical and Health Education – Representation of gender, sexuality, violence, and televised sports in the media are all avenues that can be explored in the classroom.
    • Mathematics – Teachers of mathmatics will find that a great deal of research in the mass media depends on statistics. Hence, the skills of compilation and graphing will be important. In the area of television, the methods of rating the most watched prime-time programs depend on the exact use of mathematical information.
    • Resource Centre Teachers – Today's resource centres contain not only books, but also a good cross-section of popular periodicals, phonograph records, slides, and audio – and videotapes. In the area of print, many periodicals, such as Time and Maclean's, require not only the traditional reading skills, but also media-literacy decoding skills as well. Resource centre teachers can play a valuable role by helping students and teachers to understand the strengths and limitations of each medium when they are selecting resource materials.
  5. Cross-media studies and interdisciplinary strategies
    The issues, trends, and special events of our time are simultaneously reflected in all or several of the mass media. Hence, whether the topic is the arms race, the promotion of a rock star, an advertising campaign, or sexuality and violence in the media, a cross-media analysis is required. The effective application of the key concepts of media depends on the integration of several media. A discussion of violence in the media, for example, might combine knowledge from history, literature, sociology, psychology, communications theory, and linguistics.
  6. Creative experiences
    As well as being able to "decode" the symbols that dominate their society, students should be able to "encode" them. Just as we must integrate writing with the development of reading skills, we should integrate formal media analysis with media production. Thus, creative or production activities should be an essential component of media studies in the classroom. These creative activities can range from something as short and simple as sequencing a series of photographs to a project as complex as the production of a rock video. Many students will grasp the analytic material only if they have undergone production experiences.
  7. Semiotics
    Semiotics is the science of signs and is concerned primarily with how meaning is generated in film, television, and other works of art. It is concerned with what signs are and the ways that information is encoded in them. Some of the decoding/deconstructing activities in this guide use strategies from semiotics. This approach, which has had considerable influence on European academics and media teachers, is now coming into its own in North America. While it may appear to be intellectually demanding and somewhat abstract, it can yield many rewards for the dedicated media teacher. The following books are useful references in this area: Roland Barthes, Mythologies (New York: Hill & Wang, 1972); James Monaco, How to Read a Film; Robert Scholes, Semiotics and Interpretation (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1982).
  8. Reading the media environment
    Each medium of communication has its own biases and ideology. When we interact with a medium of communication, we are influenced as much by the form of the medium as by its message. To explore this notion further, we should ask the following question about each communication medium: What would life be like without this medium? Finding answers to the following questions might also help us to understand better the effects of our interactions with our media of communication:
    • How does it work (e.g., technically, physiologically)?
    • When/how was it discovered/invented?
    • How did its use develop (e.g., socially, economically, politically)?
    • Who are its outstanding users? What do they communicate? How?
    • What are the medium's present conventions? How did they develop?
    • What are its present limitations? How are they best exploited?
    • How does the medium affect its users and how do they affect it?
    • How have other media affected this one?
  9. Alternative points of view
    As a counter to the mass media, which are generally, conservative and constitute a major industry in which the profit motive is paramount, teachers, depending on the level of the class, can show films and videos that present an alternative vision or a different kind of perception and experience to that of the mainstream media. These should be a supplement to, and not take the place of, the study of popular models. Many excellent narrative and documentary films by the National Film Board of Canada and by many experimental filmmakers and video artists, for example, will challenge students' ways of seeing the world. Of course, good literature and art will do the same. Certainly contemporary culture can be illuminated from many sources: by a small-circulation magazine with a distinctively alternative point of view; by a provocative CBC radio documentary; by a record of a contemporary fusion jazz combo, a small independent rock band, or the work of a performance artist/musician such as Laurie Anderson.
  10. Full-credit courses in media literacy
    These courses, offered at the secondary school level, will probably be presented as one of the optional courses in English or the visual arts and will reflect a great diversity of approaches. The following are examples of areas covered by such courses:
    • Pop culture: An understanding of some of the following: popular culture and trends; the coverage of royalty; the appeal of the current rock megastars; pop culture's fascination with rituals; the nature and power of celebrities; fashion TV (television programs that are concerned with the world of fashion, showcasing the latest trends and profiling fashion designers); fast-food happiness (the extensive marketing of fast-food restaurants through advertising campaigns that convey the idea that such eateries bring happiness by solving all one's problems); fads – from pet rocks to Cabbage Patch dolls; the appeal of shopping malls; pop culture in a foreign country; the culture of toys; the appeal of cult film patterns in teen films; formulas in best sellers; the appeal of Harlequin romance novels; the pop culture of the fifties and sixties.
    • The world of images: Media images of men and women; analysing photographs; adolescent magazines; analysing advertisements – signs and codes; dividing the world.
    • The information society: Current theories and research on the impact of the electronic media; the theories of Marshall McLuhan regarding the global village, the nature of perception, and the use of our senses; the dynamics of third-wave technology (electronic technology and the use of computers); the computer revolution; the role of new and emergent technology.
    • The study of specific media or a genre within a medium: Course units are often devoted to in-depth study of a specific medium (e.g., film, television, the newspaper). The study of a medium can be subdivided further through the study of specific genres. A unit on a genre in films might explore the nature of horror films in radio, suspense drama; in television, the evolution of sitcoms.
    • Television production: The nature of the television medium; the dynamics of television production; script writing and storyboards; the use of the portable video camera; the creation of a mini-documentary and a commercial; the use of special effects; applications of the mobile studio."

 


A Scaffolding Approach to Media Education

Scaffolding, developing a unit of study through a set sequence of steps, is well suited to Media Education. Scaffolding involves:

  1. Providing students with an overall picture of what will be expected of them.
  2. Breaking up and sequencing the order in which various concepts, skills, and applications of skills will be taught and assessed.
  3. Checking for students' understanding of what is being taught and requiring students to complete parts of the project as we go along.
  4. And finally the product -- student demonstration of their understanding and teacher and/or peer evaluation of their understanding.

If, for example, students are going to do a presentation giving an analysis of the codes and conventions of sitcoms, ideally the scaffolding would proceed this way:

  1. Model what such a presentation would look like.
  2. Teach them the relevant codes and conventions.
  3. Practice identifying codes and conventions in various sitcoms. (Allow students repeated opportunities to apply what they are learning so they can integrate that knowledge into their presentations.)
  4. Require them to research and put together their presentation.
  5. Before students present their work, have them submit an outline, including notes or ideas for what they intend to use.
  6. Finally, present of students' understanding and evaluation of this understanding. (See Evaluating Media Products for evaluation ideas.)

 

 
Footnotes: 

"Specific Approaches to Media Literacy," Barry Duncan et al. Media Literacy Resource Guide, Ontario Ministry of Education. Toronto, ON., Canada, 1989. Pages 14-19.

Author Bio: 

Barry Duncan, founding president of the Association for Media Literacy in Canada, is one of the pioneers of the media literacy movement in Canada. He writes Barry's Bulletin three times during the year, a column for teachers on media literacy.

Making Your Voice Heard: Tips for Getting on Talk Radio.

Article Images: 

MediaValues

This article originally appeared in Issue# 58
Body: 

Institutional changes in the way the media operates are necessary to keep healthy democratic dialogue alive. But while we work towards fundamental changes in the way the media works, the public can tap newspapers, radio, and TV to make their voices heard. Too few members of the public take advantage of these opportunities.

What can you do? One of the quickest, easiest, and least expensive steps you can take is to call radio talk shows.

Talk radio has become immensely popular across the country. Hundreds of talk radio shows are on the air. You may not listen to them but millions of people do. In fact, 11.6 million listeners tune in to Rush Limbaugh and his callers each week. The efforts of some hosts - Michael Jackson, Larry Josephson, and Rush Limbaugh, among others - are distributed nationwide. Some are strictly local. Not all talk shows discuss political issues, but many do. Talk radio provides an electronic forum, not unlike the town square 200 years ago, for the public exchange of ideas and opinion. Like the broadsides and pamphlets of those days, talk radio represents a wide spectrum of political opinion.

Talk radio not only offers the public an opportunity to air opinions and discuss issues, it can also wield meaningful political power. In l989, when Congress was about to vote itself a pay raise, a coalition of talk show hosts galvanized the public and defeated the measure.

You may feel a little uncomfortable or nervous about the idea of calling a radio show. Don't be embarrassed. Lots of people feel that way. Most of us were taught how to pull a voting lever or write to the President, but are less familiar with how the broadcasting media works. It takes practice. Before you make your call arrange a role-playing session with a friend or colleague. Select a topic and have your listener act as the host. Jot down a few notes for yourself and practice what you're going to say.

Once you're comfortable with calling, get ambitious. Talk show hosts are always looking for new people and new ideas to present on their shows. Survey talk radio shows in your region. Get to know the subject matter, politics, and style of individual show hosts. Knowing the terrain will help you determine which shows to approach with your agenda. You can approach talk show producers with a press release followed up by a phone call or simply by phone. (Don't forget to plan what you're going to say before you call!)

 
Author Bio: 

Barbara Osborn, former media literacy teacher and freelance journalist in Los Angeles, was a contributing editor to MEDIA&VALUES.

Beyond Blame: Media Literacy as Violence Prevention

Article Images: 

MediaValues

This article originally appeared in Issue# 62
Body: 

Beyond the blame...beyond the debate...are human beings – children, young people and adults of all ages -- who are daily bombarded with violent images from the media and popular culture.

The parameters of this problem, as we've seen in the pages of this issue, are complex and interrelated. There are First Amendment concerns as well as public policies resulting from the deregulation of the media industry during the Reagan years. And as Walter Wink so eloquently writes in the first article, violence is the very stuff of our fundamental mythologies, including the myth of the American West.

While Hollywood may feed these myths, Hollywood did not start them. Nor can Washington legislate them under the rug.

Violence cannot be sanitized out of our culture even if, as I predict, and hope, gruesome and gratuitous violence becomes "politically incorrect" in popular entertainment. Over the decades,we've seen the media industry "self-censor" many creative ideas and images from the Amos 'n Andy stereotype of African Americans to the use of alcohol, cigarettes and even hard drugs. Excessive violence can be added to the list.

 


Media literacy must be a necessary component of any effective effort at violence prevention, for both individuals and society as a whole.

 

But there will still be violence in life, and in the media, because there is evil in the world and human nature has its shadow side. There is also grinding poverty and addiction and meaninglessness which creates a seedbed for violence as way for some to cope with injustice. Such violence will find its way into the news and into the storylines of both high art and popular culture.

After months of researching and working on this issue, it is clear to me that media literacy must be a necessary component of any effective effort at violence prevention, for both individuals and society as a whole.

I want to be clear that programs of media literacy do not excuse the storytellers of society from their share of responsibility for our cultural environment. But here are five ways I believe that media literacy can contribute to lessening the impact and incidence of violence in our world.

 

  1. Reduce exposure to media violence, particularly of the young, by educating parents and caretakers about the issue and helping them to develop and enforce age-appropriate viewing limits. How many times have you been in a violent R-rated movie and seen children there? Adults must come to realize that media violence today is different than when they were growing up. Parent organizations, churches and social workers need to get the message out that too much media violence can truly harm children. Programs of media literacy for parents can help.

     

     

  2. Change the impact of violent images that are seen -- by deconstructing the techniques used to stage violent scenes and decoding the various depictions of violence in different genres -- news, cartoons, drama, sports and music.

     

    It is important for children to learn early on the difference between reality and fantasy and to know how costumes and camera angles and special effects can fool or mesmerize them. Media literacy activities need to be integrated into every learning environment -- school, church or temple, Scouts and clubs.

     

  3. Locate and explore alternatives to storytelling that highlights violence as the preferred solution to human conflict. Schools, libraries and families (and don't forget grandparents) need to have access to books and tapes that provide positive role models to help counterbalance the actions and attitudes of today's "superheros." Through media literacy classes, parents can also learn to transform undesirable images from popular culture into opportunities for positive modeling. One father, for example, let his child watch Teen-Age Mutant Ninja Turtles, but only if the child would imagine a fifth turtle named "Gandhi." Afterwards they had a great discussion on how "Ninja Gandhi" might get the Turtles out of trouble without resorting to violence!

     

     

  4. Uncover and challenge the cultural, economic and political supports for media violence - militarism, greed, competition, dominance, structural poverty-- as well as the personal ways we may each be contributing to the creation or perpetuation of a mediated culture of violence. We must not forget that the root of our cherished freedom of speech was not to protect creativity but to challenge the political and economic status quo. Media literacy empowers its participants to ask hard questions of themselves, of others and of society, by applying the principles of critical thinking to experiences that look like "mindless entertainment." Indeed the systemic analysis provided through media literacy can provide a learning curve to an informed and knowledgeable media activism.

     

     

  5. Break the cycle of blame and promote informed and rational public debate about these issues in schools, community and civic gatherings, religious groups and the media itself. The grim reality of our current situation demands that we ask two fundamental questions of ourselves as a society:
    1. What kind of culture do we want our children to grow up in?
    2. Can we continue to allow media makers to profit from products that are clearly contributing to a social condition that endangers public safety? An informed public is less vulnerable to extremist views or actions.

       

 
Author Bio: 

Elizabeth Thoman, a pioneering leader in the U.S. media literacy field, founded Media&Values magazine in 1977 and the Center for Media Literacy in 1989. She is a graduate of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Southern California and continues her leadership through this website, consulting, speaking and as a founding board member of the Alliance for a Media Literate America (AMLA).

Pages